Yesterday the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), in partnership with the New York Attorney General, filed a lawsuit in a federal district court against the leaders of a massive debt collection scheme based out of Buffalo, N.Y. The lawsuit alleges Douglas MacKinnon and Mark Gray operate a network of companies that harass, threaten, and deceive millions of consumers across the nation into paying inflated debts or amounts they may not owe. The Bureau is seeking to shut down this illegal operation and to obtain compensation for victims and a civil penalty against the companies and partners.
The CFPB and the New York Attorney General allege that Northern Resolution Group LLC, Enhanced Acquisitions LLC, and Delray Capital LLC are interrelated collections companies based in Buffalo, N.Y. Together, the companies have purchased millions of dollars’ worth of consumer debt and collected some of those debts directly. The companies were created, operated, and are overseen by Douglas MacKinnon and Mark Gray.
The complaint alleges that since at least 2009, Northern Resolution Group, Enhanced Acquisitions, and Delray Capital, operating under the supervision of MacKinnon and Gray, have served as the lynchpin of a massive collections scheme. The operation routinely inflates consumer debts and relies on illegal tactics to extract as much money as possible from consumers for debts. MacKinnon also set up a network of at least 60 additional fly-by-night debt-collection firms to collect on the large debt portfolios purchased by Northern Resolution Group, Enhanced Acquisitions, and Delray Capital. This elaborate network also served as “window dressing,” or a workaround, when other debt sellers would no longer do business with the defendants.
The CFPB alleges that the defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The CFPB and the New York Attorney General also allege that the defendants violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in the consumer financial marketplace.
Specifically, the CFPB and the New York Attorney General allege that MacKinnon, Gray, and their network of debt collection companies:
consumer debts and misrepresented amounts consumers owed: The defendants
misrepresented to consumers that they owed sums they did not owe, were not
obligated to pay, or that the companies did not have a legal right to collect.
Specifically, Northern Resolution Group, Enhanced Acquisitions, and Delray
Capital illegally added $200 to each consumer debt account they acquired,
regardless of whether applicable state law or the underlying contract between
the consumer and the original issuer permitted such fees or charges. In some
cases, the scheme further inflated the amounts owed by tacking on additional
unauthorized fees and charges to the debts. At times, some collectors
quoted consumers balances that exceeded 600 percent of the debt amount.
threatened legal action: The companies falsely threatened consumer with
legal action that the collectors had no intention of taking. In reality, they
never referred a case for prosecution. In some cases the companies
falsely accused consumers of committing crimes. Further, the companies lied to
some consumers, claiming that they would be arrested to pressure them to pay
debts. In one case, the companies instructed a consumer that she did not even
have time to get a lawyer because she would be arrested the next day. These
deceptive practices could also have affected the relative priority consumers
gave to competing financial commitments.
law-enforcement officials, government agencies, and court officers: The
companies faked calls and emails to make it appear the communications were coming
from government or court officials. The companies used call-spoofing
technologies to make it appear that collectors were calling from government
agencies. The collection agents would barrage consumers and relatives
with calls, claiming to be a government official who could arrest the consumer
for non-payment of the debt. The companies also used emails to pretend they
were contacting consumers and their family from a court.
The complaint also alleges repeated fraudulent acts and deceptive acts or practices in violation of New York law, as well as violations of New York state debt-collection law.
One example detailed is that Delray’s scripts direct collectors to tell consumers the following: “You need to be aware of multiple fraud charges being filed against you in ___ County. It is imperative I speak with you to debrief you on your case and retain a statement in your defense. Failure to respond will result in you forfeiting your right to settle this case on a voluntary basis and it will be forwarded out for prosecution.” The complaint then states that Enhanced and Delray never referred a case for “prosecution” or even filed a debt-collection lawsuit against a consumer.
According to the complaint, MacKinnon and Gray have known about, directed, and encouraged these illegal collections practices and have profited significantly—amounting to tens of millions of dollars annually. These illegal profits have been funneled back to MacKinnon, his relatives, and Gray through payments to various sham companies that MacKinnon, Gray, and MacKinnon’s relatives controlled.
Through this lawsuit, the Bureau seeks to stop the alleged unlawful practices of MacKinnon, Gray, Northern Resolution Group LLC, Enhanced Acquisitions LLC, and Delray Capital LLC. The Bureau has also requested that the court impose penalties on the company and its partners for their conduct and require that compensation be paid to consumers who have been harmed.
The full text of the complaint can be found here.
From the perspective of legitimate debt collection agencies, it is encouraging to see regulators use language like "sham collection companies" and "illegal operation."
In an article yesterday, the Wall Street Journal ties this action together with the CFPB's debt collection rulemaking activity:
The legal action comes as the CFPB and other regulators turn up the heat on debt collectors. In July, the CFPB unveiled an outline for new rules to rein in their aggressive practices, which would mark the first overhaul of federal oversight of the debt-collection market in four decades.
What isn't acknowledged is that the individuals and organizations involved in the action by the CFPB and the New York Attorney General are allegedly in wanton violation of laws that already exist. Many legitimate collectors, all of which have extensive policies and procedures in place (which they regularly revisit with the intent to refine and improve), are enthusiastically engaged with regulators in this current opportunity to modernize and clarify grey areas of federal debt collection laws.
insideARM suspects it is unlikely that "sham collection companies," with policies and procedures that are simply "window dressing," will comply with these new rules -- or any rules -- and applauds the efforts of regulators to call them out.